PMBoK Process Groups. Part 3

We’ve decided to create a series of articles dedicated to the PMBOK methodology to help structure and summarize key knowledge in project management. We’re starting this series with a reminder of the most well-known — the fifth edition of PMBOK, which remains popular for its structured approach, practicality, and wide adoption across many industries.
Be sure to follow our new articles on the website — this will help you stay updated on best practices, strengthen your expertise, and manage projects more effectively.

This is the third article in our series on the PMBOK methodology. If you haven’t familiarized yourself with the basics yet, we recommend reading the first overview of the PMBOK methodology and the detailed description of PMBOK.

Project management is the art of organizing resources, time, and effort to achieve specific goals. The PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowledge) methodology from PMI (Project Management Institute) provides a structured approach through process groups that cover the entire project lifecycle.

This article explores each of the five PMBOK process groups in detail, their interrelationships, specific tools and methods, and examines practical applications across various industries. We’ll also discuss how to adapt these processes to unique project needs and how to integrate the PMBOK methodology with modern agile approaches.

Understanding PMBOK Process Groups

According to the PMBOK methodology, project management can be divided into five main process groups:

• Initiating — defining a new project or phase and obtaining authorization to begin.
• Planning — establishing scope, objectives, and actions necessary to achieve outcomes.
• Executing — coordinating people and resources to carry out the plan.
• Monitoring and Controlling — tracking progress, identifying deviations, and taking corrective actions.
• Closing — formalizing acceptance of the product or service and ending the project.

PMBOK Process Groups and their interaction

It’s important to understand that these process groups are not linear phases. They interact and overlap throughout the project lifecycle. For instance, monitoring and controlling processes occur in parallel with execution processes, and planning processes may repeat as the project evolves.

Detailed Overview of Process Groups

1. Initiating

The initiating process group defines a new project or phase and obtains authorization to begin work. This critical stage lays the foundation for the entire project’s success.

Key processes:

• Developing the project charter
• Identifying stakeholders

Tools and techniques:

• Expert judgment
• Data gathering methods (interviews, focus groups, surveys)
• Data analysis methods (stakeholder analysis, document analysis)
• Meetings

Practical example: A healthcare company decided to develop a new patient management system. During initiation, the team held meetings with leadership to define business needs, developed a project charter outlining general objectives, budget and timeline, identified key stakeholders (doctors, nurses, administrators, IT department, and patients), and obtained formal approval from the project sponsor.

2. Planning

Planning processes constitute the largest and most detailed group in the PMBOK methodology. Effective planning creates the roadmap for achieving project objectives.

Key processes:

• Developing the project management plan
• Planning scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, communications, and risk management
• Creating work breakdown structure (WBS)
• Defining activities and estimating durations
• Developing schedule and determining budget

Tools and techniques:

• Critical Path Method (CPM)
• Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
• Decision tree analysis
• Gantt charts
• Responsibility assignment matrix (RACI)

Practical example: In a software development project, planning included creating a detailed project management plan with clear scope, schedule, and budget; developing a WBS that broke down work into modules, features, and subtasks; estimating the duration of each task based on previous project experience and expert opinions; identifying and analyzing risks including technical, personnel, and market risks; and planning communications through weekly meetings and daily standups.

3. Executing

Executing processes involve coordinating people and resources, managing stakeholder expectations, and integrating and performing project activities according to the project management plan.

Key processes:

• Directing project work
• Managing project knowledge
• Managing quality and team
• Implementing communications
• Conducting procurements
• Managing stakeholder engagement

Tools and techniques:

• Meetings and decision-making methods
• Conflict management
• Project management information systems
• Communication methods

Practical example: In a residential complex construction project, execution included coordinating construction crews according to schedule, holding regular meetings with contractors to ensure quality standards compliance, procuring construction materials according to the procurement plan, regularly informing stakeholders about progress, managing teams from various specialties, solving unforeseen problems like supply delays or adverse weather conditions, and documenting changes and obtaining necessary approvals.

4. Monitoring and Controlling

Monitoring and controlling processes track, review, and regulate project progress and performance; identify areas where changes to the plan are needed; and initiate corresponding changes.

Key processes:

• Monitoring project work
• Integrated change control
• Controlling scope, schedule, cost, quality, and resources
• Monitoring communications, risks, procurements, and stakeholder engagement

Tools and techniques:

• Earned Value Management (EVM)
• Control charts and variance analysis
• Trend analysis
• Inspections and audits

Practical example: In an ERP system implementation project, monitoring and control included weekly analysis of completed work compared to the plan using earned value method, regular team meetings to discuss deviations and issues, budget monitoring to ensure compliance with financial constraints, regular risk assessment to identify new threats, conducting quality control through testing and acceptance trials, managing changes through a formal change request process, and monthly reports for management with key performance indicators.

5. Closing

Closing processes are performed to formally complete all activities across all process groups, to formally close the project, phase, or contractual obligations.

Key processes:

• Closing the project or phase
• Closing procurements

Tools and techniques:

• Expert judgment
• Document analysis
• Analytical methods
• Meetings

Practical example: In a new marketing campaign launch project, closing included preparing a final report with campaign results, holding a meeting with the client to confirm acceptance of results, documenting lessons learned for future projects, closing contracts with external agencies, archiving all materials and documents, conducting team and individual contribution evaluations, and celebrating success with the team and stakeholders.

Relationship Between Process Groups

While process groups may seem linear, they are in fact closely interrelated and often overlap. Here are key relationships:

Initiating → Planning: Initiation outputs, such as the project charter and stakeholder identification, serve as inputs for planning processes.

Planning ↔ Executing: Project plans guide execution, but during execution, changes often arise requiring replanning.

Executing ↔ Monitoring and Controlling: Execution occurs under the supervision of monitoring and controlling processes, ensuring work aligns with the plan.

Monitoring and Controlling → Planning: Identified deviations may require changes to plans, leading to updated project plans.

Executing → Closing: Execution results must be formalized and accepted in the closing process.

Adapting Process Groups to Unique Project Needs

The PMBOK methodology is a framework, not a rigid set of rules. Each project is unique and requires adaptation of processes to its characteristics:

Conclusion

The PMBOK process groups provide a robust framework for managing projects across industries, ensuring consistency, efficiency, and adaptability. By breaking project management into five key groups—Initiating, Planning, Executing, Monitoring and Controlling, and Closing—the methodology offers a structured yet flexible approach to achieving project goals. Each group plays a critical role, with interdependencies that allow for iterative adjustments as projects evolve.

While PMBOK emphasizes structure, it is not rigid. It can be tailored to suit small or large projects, industry-specific needs, and varying risk tolerances. Additionally, its compatibility with agile methodologies highlights its versatility in modern project environments. By leveraging tools like Earned Value Management, Gantt charts, and stakeholder analysis, teams can enhance decision-making and performance tracking. Ultimately, mastering the PMBOK process groups empowers project managers to deliver successful outcomes while fostering continuous improvement and adaptability in an ever-changing business landscape.